Since 03-01-06
Vets May Be Denied Health Care
Since 03-01-06
From:
Waspscpo@aol.com [mailto:Waspscpo@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 7:10 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: Vets May Be Denied Health Care
http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,89556,00.html?ESRC=eb.nl
Vets May Be Denied Health Care
Military.com & Associated Press
February 28, 2006
WASHINGTON - At least tens of thousands of veterans with non-critical medical
issues could suffer delayed or even denied care in coming years to enable
President Bush to meet his promise of cutting the deficit in half - if the White
House is serious about its proposed budget. After an increase for next year, the
Bush budget would turn current trends on their head. Even though the cost of
providing medical care to veterans has been growing by leaps and bounds, White
House budget documents assume a cutback in 2008 and further cuts thereafter.
In fact, the proposed cuts are so draconian that it seems to some that the White
House is simply making them up to make its long-term deficit figures look
better. More realistic numbers, however, would raise doubts as to whether Bush
can keep his promise to wrestle the deficit under control by the time he leaves
office.
"Either the administration is proposing gutting
VA healthcare over the next five years or it is not serious about its own
budget," said Rep. Chet Edwards of Texas, top Democrat on the panel overseeing
the VA's budget. "If the proposals aren't serious, then that would undermine the
administration's argument that they intend to reduce the deficit in half over
the next several years."
In fact, the White House doesn't seem serious about the numbers. It says the
long-term budget numbers don't represent actual administration policies. Similar
cuts assumed in earlier budgets have been reversed. "Instead, the president's
subsequent budgets have increased funding for all of these programs," said White
House budget office spokesman Scott Milburn.
"The country can meet the goal of cutting the deficit in half and still invest
in key programs for vulnerable Americans, and claims to the contrary aren't
supported by the facts of recent budget history." The veterans' medical care
cuts would come even though more and more people are trying to enter the system
and as the number of people wounded in
Iraq keeps rising.
Even though Iraq war veterans represent only about 2 percent of the Veterans
Administration's patient caseload, many are returning from battle with grievous
injuries requiring costly care. The White House budget office, however, assumes
that the veterans' medical services budget - up 69 percent since Bush took
office and which would rise by 11 percent next year under Bush's budget - can
absorb cuts for three years in a row after that. The cuts are outlined in a
673-page computer printout that has not been officially released by the White
House budget office.
However, it found its way into the hands of the Center of Budget and Policy
Priorities, a liberal-leaning Washington think tank. The administration insists
it makes spending policies one year at a time and that the long-term veterans'
budget figures are therefore subject to change. "We don't make multiyear
discretionary funding requests," said Veterans Administration spokesman Scott
Hogenson, who declined to speculate on whether long-term cuts were realistic.
"We look at our needs and assess our needs on a year-to-year basis." The rapidly
growing budget for veterans' medical services, funded for the current year at
$24.5 billion, would leap to $27.7 billion in 2007 under Bush's budget. But the
medical services budget faces a 3 percent cut in 2008 and would hover below $27
billion for the next four years, even as increasing numbers of veterans from the
Iraq war claim their benefits and the costs of providing care to elderly
World War II and Korean War veterans continue to rise.
Those cuts would prove traumatic to the already troubled VA medical system, and
would force staff cuts, delay investment in new medical equipment and deny care
to hundreds of thousands of veterans. "The only way you can do what they want to
do in terms of actually cutting the budget is to throw a lot of veterans out who
are already in the system and/or redefine who is a veteran," said Rick Weidman,
director of government relations for the
Vietnam Veterans of America.
Even with recent funding increases, cost-cutting moves have locked more than a
quarter million veterans out of the system. Those excluded have no illnesses or
injuries attributable to their military service and earn more than the average
wage in their community. In Bush's proposal to cut the deficit in half by the
end of his term, he's assuming spending on domestic agency operating budgets can
be frozen over the next few years.
"Each year the budget numbers go up," said Jeff Schrade, spokesman for Senate
Veterans Affairs Committee Chairman Larry Craig, R-Idaho. "Speculation
beyond 2007's budget is, at this point, just speculation." But without the cuts,
Bush's plan to halve the deficit would be far more difficult to achieve. For
example, just freezing the budget for veterans' medical services below $27
billion understates the deficit for 2009 by perhaps $5 billion.Sound Off...What
do you think?
Join the discussion.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Contributed,
YNCS Don Harribine, USN(ret)