Charlie Adams' fax to Congress on broken promises

Since 01-20-06

From: Floyd Sears <fsears@bellsouth.net>
To: !CAG/MRGRG e-mail network <fsears@bellsouth.net>
Subject: [MRGRG-MS] [Fwd: FAX]
Date: Jan 19, 2006 7:54 PM


MRGRG-MS Main Page http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MRGRG-MS

The following message from Charlie Adams is posted on the Internet at http://mrgrg-ms.org/fax-it.html

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: FAX
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:26:52 EST
From: CAdams5804@aol.com

Charles Adams
6523 Yellowhammer Ave.
Tampa FL 33625-1549
Telephone (813) 920-7318 Fax (813) 926-1438

January 18, 2006

Subject: Personal Accountability

Each member of the Armed Forces of the United States of America was repeatedly contracted with for lifetime Medical Care for the member and all eligible dependents if
1) the member reenlisted;
2) served for twenty, or more, years;
3) qualified for retirement;
4) applied for retirement.

Unit Retention Counselors were appointed on Special Orders which are a recognized formal US government document. The Counselor was usually the Senior NCO of the unit. All Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) contract procedures were satisfied, at least those UCC contract procedures taught in just about every college/university in the United States. The formal contract included an
1) Offer for lifetime medical care for the member and all eligible dependents.
2) Acceptance of the offer was acknowledged by
3) Signature,
4) Date of Acceptance,
5) Time to Start: upon retirement of the member,
6) Time to End: death of the member/last eligible dependent.

The Congressional Research Service has issued four different versions of a report on military retiree health care benefits. No CRS report even mentions, the very formal, and legal, procedures outlined above. Inspectors, as well as researchers, have great responsibility. Others depend upon them for honest all inclusive reports. Courts may take action on their false/incomplete reports. When incomplete CRS Reports are used by legislative assistants, false recommendations are made to Congress.

En banc US Court of Appeals Case 99-1402 Schism & Reinlie V United States almost parrots the CRS reports on Military Retiree Health Care. The Court is silent upon Legislative Intent of Congress and the very formal 50 years performance to the contracts.

The court decision casts tarnish on the international contributions of individuals such as Secretary of War Henry Stimpson, General of the Armies George Marshall, President Dwight Eisenhower, and other leaders who allowed establishment of the formal contracts.

For fifty years Congress allotted funds for health care of all military members. The en banc Court ruled that the annual appropriation bills did not specify funds for Military Retiree health care.

A question, Congress person, are specific amounts for alcohol/drug purchase included in State Department/CIA/Defense/Treasury appropriation bills?

What is the difference in non-segregated funds for the health care of all Military and a specific dollar amount for purchase of alcohol consumption by diplomats intelligence operatives?

These are procedures that Congress knows are essential for the USA. From 1943-1996 Congress allotted funds for Health Care of all military. The bills were similarly worded to complete the missions that Congress tasked the military, drug enforcers and diplomats to complete.

Sincerely,

Charles G. Adams, CMSgt, USAF (Ret), 1948-1977

X-Unit Retention Counselor, X-Unit Senior NCO, X-1st Sgt, X-NCOIC Radar Maint

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

Visit your group "MRGRG-MS" http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MRGRG-MS on the web.