NumbersUSA in NY Times  and NYT put big slur to Conservatives on Illegal Aliens
Hit Counter
07-15-07


From: Lowell J Mix [mailto:ljmix@juno.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2007 11:16 PM
To: immigrationinfo@numbersusa.com
Subject: Re: We're in New York Times today

 

Roy,

 

It is impressive that the New York Times gave this much space to NumbersUSA.  With one exception, I believe the article is quite accurately descriptive of NumbersUSA and our mission.

 

However, there is one "obscure" where they have inserted a slur designed to stigmatize NumbersUSA with racial discrimination, which I believe we should strongly refute and object to (unless it is true of course).  That is the statement in the paragraph that is in red, the second sentence, which states, "“Roy Beck takes people who are upset about illegal immigration for different reasons, including hostility to Latino immigrants, and disciplines them so their message is based on policy rather than race-based arguments or xenophobia.”

 

I strongly object to the phrase they used "...including hostility to Latino Immigrants,....."  In my opinion, this is racist and the New York Times should be held accountable for promoting this lie.  Hostility toward Latino Immigrants had nothing to do with our objects, reasoning, and actions.  In reality, I believe we won because our position was COMMON SENSE.  Is there not some way you can throw this back in the face of the New York Times for promoting racism?

 

I am also presenting here a copy of a letter I wrote to our Florida Senator who ignored his constituents and voted contrary to our wishes in support of the Amnesty Bill.  I believe this letter further codify's our Immigration Reform concerns, and puts it all into an easy to understand, implement, and support perspective that sums up the majority of our real concerns against blanket amnesty.  As you are aware, their is now a recall move afoot against the FL Senator Martinez for his failure to recognize or support Florida Constituents against S.1639.  As the Senator became aware of this, he started back pedaling to justify his position.  Here is a copy of my response to his reply, which has been reviewed and deemed appropriate by many Floridians who are now members of NumbersUSA.  You are free to use this letter, publicize it, or do anything you deem necessary to help solidify Americans opposition to any attempt to revive this issue or to slip parts of it into other bills.

To: Mel_Martinez@martinez.senate.gov
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 02:30:06 -0500
Subject: Re: Response to your recent comments

Senator,

 

After receiving feedback from many constituents who read my response to you before, the majority opinion is that I short-changed my answer in my attempt to be polite and in the process, I did not address the key issues; issues that more clearly define the problems with your stand for S.1639, the so-called Amnesty Bill for Illegal Aliens.  Therefore, let me offer some ways you could redeem yourself in the eyes of Florida's voters before the next election.  All you need to do is sponsor an Immigration Reform Bill now that accomplishes the principles I outline below, and succeed in preventing any other legislation to water down, amend or otherwise dilute the full intent of these elements.

 

First, let me point out what your constituents are saying.  This is important since you have not been listening to us.  We believe that  you had no intention of doing the right thing in this legislation based on your actions.  You make note that there is a need to change the immigration laws.  Do you think we are all a bunch of dummies?  Do you think we do not know that your idea of change is to ease immigration restrictions instead of tightening them?  That is not compatible with how your constituents feel. 

 

Here are some basic steps that do require changing: 

 

1)  All immigrants must speak English (only natural so they can obey our laws).

2)  All immigrants must take naturalization tests in English and assimilate into America.  A major problem in the system today is that there too many immigrant communities where they are loyal to their countries of origin, and NOT to the USA.

3)  We need to address the problem of cutting off freebies that are now being paid for on the backs of American Citizens.  This in itself will "inspire" the majority of illegals to return to their home countries on their own.

4)  We need to send anyone who does not adopt this country's principles and laws back to where they came from.  If they are not here to assimilate, then chances are they are here to assassinate.

5)  We need to enforce the legislation, laws, and controls that are already on the books before we start making more of them.

6)  You need to support America and American Citizens first, not the illegal criminals.

7)  All illegal immigrants must return to their home of origin, learn English, and then apply to immigrate into our County via legal processes to redeem themselves.  The fact that they are criminals is of their doing, not ours.  They need to repent, not us.

8)  We need to enforce absolute control of the US Borders.  That means we do whatever is necessary to enforce current laws against illegal entry into the USA.  It does not mean we jail our Border Patrol Agents for enforcing the laws of our land.  It means that we jail illegal criminals for breaking our laws.  It means we give our National Guard Troops weapons and the means to enforce and stop Border infiltrations, and stop playing tag with the illegals.

9)  We need to set up procedures for the employment of legals, and enforce it so that illegals cannot be employed.

10)  It means you, Sir, must stop thinking in terms of being a profiteering, career politician, and get back to thinking AMERICAN.

 

Now this is the kind of bill we need to start real Immigration Reform in America.  You stated yourself that any solution to this problem must be practical to be effective.  Ok, I have outlined and spelled PRACTICAL for you.  If you can generate a bill that takes in all that I have stated above in the very near future, you might redeem yourself in the eyes of your constituents, and you will have truly reformed Immigration beyond anything that has been proposed so far.  Want to be a hero?  Here is your chance.  Otherwise my friend, we see you as nothing but hot air that needs to be recalled and striped of all duties as our State's Senator so that you can stop contributing to global warning by closing your mouth.  We don't want you if you cannot or will not represent us for true immigration reform.

 

Can you think in these terms?  This is not the entire problem or solution, of course, but it is the place where Congress should be starting, not throwing up your hands and pleading Amnesty for all the criminals because politicians want the illegal votes or are afraid to stand up and be counted Pro-America.  We DON'T need to give our Country away to non-American criminal elements; neither do we need to appease them.

 

And be warned again; the talk among your constituents today is that since you are not for us, you must be against us.  And a serious recall action is even now underway.  How it plays out will depend in large part what you do about this illegal immigration problem to resolve it, not to complicate it or forget it.  Believe me, it is not going to go away; but you might.  The ball is now in your court! 

 

Sincerely,

Lowell J. Mix


On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:38:16 -0400 Mel_Martinez@martinez.senate.gov writes:

 

Below is a response to the recent comments I received from you:

Dear Friend:

Thank you for contacting me regarding immigration reform. I appreciate hearing from you and would like to respond to your concerns.

As you may know, on June 28, 2007, the Senate voted to set aside debate once again on the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007 (S.1639).

I firmly believe addressing this issue in a comprehensive manner is critical to our nation’s security and continued prosperity. While securing our borders is top priority, we must also address the economic and law enforcement realities of having millions of illegal immigrants already living and working in the United States. Any solution to this problem must be practical to be effective. Efforts to secure our borders should be coupled with necessary changes to our current ambiguous and ineffective immigration policies to maximize security for our country. Additionally, gaining operational control of the border will not cease the problem if we do not gain control of our employment system. Please know that, I will continue to work with President Bush and my colleagues in Congress to develop a plan that will halt the flow of illegal immigrants crossing our border while implementing needed changes to our immigration laws.

Again, thank you for sharing your thoughts with me. Do not hesitate to contact me with any additional questions or comments. For more information about issues and activities important to Florida, please sign up for my weekly newsletter at
http://martinez.senate.gov.

Sincerely,

Mel Martinez
United States Senator


On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 00:45:23 -0400 Roy Beck NumbersUSA <immigrationinfo@numbersusa.com> writes:

  

From:   Roy Beck, President, NumbersUSA

Date:   Sunday 15JUL07     12:15 a.m. EDT

 

 

NumbersUSA featured in New York Times --- Moving closer to mandatory workplace verification

 

DEAR FOES OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION,

The New York Times is something of the sacred scriptures of America's Opinion Elites and The Establishment, both of which overwhelmingly supported the giant amnesty that you just helped defeat in the Senate.

So, it is quite an event for the Times in its Sunday paper to put such a spotlight on NumbersUSA.

(Click here to read the Times article on its website -- or see text below.)

It is rather funny that NumbersUSA is getting so much media attention recently. Even though tens of thousands of you have been having a big impact on Members of Congress for years, your collective efforts are just now being noticed by most of the media who are trying to figure out how The Establishment could have lost so badly on the immigration issue. A lot of the media are now concluding that you all have been a kind of secret weapon.

Well, you aren't so secret now.

I think the more The Establishment hears about you and your size the more it will respect the possibility that it needs to change its position.

Although I'm not overly optimistic, I hope The Establishment will decide that there is no need to keep fighting to protect the ability of businesses to hire illegal aliens.

I can tell you from the last six days of our meetings with several Democratic Members of the House, with a number of their Republican counterparts, with fellow advocacy groups and with top Senate GOP staffers, there is very strong growing sentiment that it is time to remove the jobs magnet for illegal immigration.

The overwhelming favorite appears to be to make the "Basic Pilot" electronic workplace verification system mandatory for all businesses with contracts with the federal government.

We may have the opportunity this week to mobilize you to help make that happen in several places. This would be a tremendous next step in forcing the expansion of that verification program that could eventually keep most illegal aliens from obtaining a job. Without a job, most illegal aliens will go home.

As always, watch your in-box for emailed Action Alerts letting you know of critical opportunities.

And be sure you have taken all the actions you favor that are listed on your customized Action Buffet at:

www.NumbersUSA.com/actionbuffet 

Congratulations again on all the work you did that caused this New York Times article to be written.

The New York Times

July 15, 2007
A Little-Known Group Claims a Victory on Immigration

By ROBERT PEAR

WASHINGTON, July 14 — When a comprehensive immigration bill collapsed last month on the Senate floor, it was a victory for a small group that had been lobbying Congress for a decade to reduce the number of immigrants — legal and illegal — in the United States.

The group, Numbers USA, tracked every twist and turn of the bill. Its members flooded the Senate with more than a million faxes, sent through the organization’s Web site. It supplied arguments and information to senators opposing the bill.

“It was a David-and-Goliath struggle,” said Roy H. Beck, the president of Numbers USA, who had been preparing for this moment since 1996, when he wrote a book titled “The Case Against Immigration.”

Supporters of the bill included President Bush, the United States Chamber of Commerce, the high-tech industry, the Roman Catholic Church, many Hispanic organizations, farmers, restaurants, hotels and the construction industry.

“The bill had support from the opinion elite in this country,” Mr. Beck said. “But we built a grass-roots army, consumed with passion for a cause, and used the power of the Internet to go around the elites and defeat a disastrous amnesty bill.”

The measure, which died on June 28, would have offered legal status and a path to citizenship to millions of illegal immigrants and created a new temporary worker program while increasing border security.

“Numbers USA initiated and turbocharged the populist revolt against the immigration reform package,” said Frank Sharry, executive director of the National Immigration Forum, a pro-immigrant advocacy group. “Roy Beck takes people who are upset about illegal immigration for different reasons, including hostility to Latino immigrants, and disciplines them so their message is based on policy rather than race-based arguments or xenophobia.”

Representative Brian P. Bilbray, Republican of California and chairman of the Immigration Reform Caucus, said, “We’re involved in weekly discussions with Numbers USA and other immigration-control groups as part of a team effort.”

Numbers USA had fewer than 50,000 members at the end of 2004, but now counts more than 447,000, with an increase of 83 percent since January alone.

Turning to the next phase of the debate, those members will push for enforcement of existing laws and new measures to curb the employment of illegal immigrants.

“Our No. 1 legislative goal is to begin a system of mandatory workplace verification, to confirm that every employee is a United States citizen or an alien authorized to work in this country,” said Rosemary E. Jenks, director of government relations at Numbers USA.

The organization wants to reduce immigration — as Mr. Beck says in the subtitle of his book — for “moral, economic, social and environmental reasons.”

He contends that immigrants and their children are driving population growth, which he says is gobbling up open space, causing urban sprawl and creating more traffic congestion.

Moreover, Mr. Beck asserts that immigrants and temporary workers, by increasing the supply of labor, have depressed wages in industries from meatpacking to information technology. Numbers USA has worked most closely with conservative Republicans, but in recent weeks has built alliances with Democrats who share the concern.

Numbers USA keeps a scorecard showing every vote by every member of Congress on immigration-related issues since 1989. The group assigns a letter grade to each member.

Lawmakers who received an A-plus were all Republicans and included Representatives J. Dennis Hastert of Illinois and Tom Tancredo of Colorado, a presidential candidate. The lowest grades — F-minuses — went to Democrats, including Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Representative Joe Baca of California, chairman of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus.

Numbers USA objects to proposals that increase the number of legal or illegal immigrants. It steers clear of debates over the allocation of visas.

“It does not matter to us whether a visa goes to a high-tech worker, a farm worker or the sibling of a U.S. citizen,” Mr. Beck said.

Numbers USA is one of many organizations fostered by John H. Tanton, an ophthalmologist from Michigan who has also championed efforts to protect the environment, limit population growth and promote English as an official language.

Critics like the Southern Poverty Law Center and Representative Chris Cannon, Republican of Utah, have described Dr. Tanton as a father of the anti-immigration movement. Mark A. Potok, a senior researcher at the law center, called Numbers USA the “kinder, gentler side of that movement.”

Mr. Beck said Numbers USA had been independent of Dr. Tanton since 2002. On the group’s Web site, Mr. Beck cautions against “immigrant bashing” and says, “Even illegal aliens deserve humane treatment as they are detected, detained and deported.”

In the fight over the Senate bill, Numbers USA had daily conference calls with conservative groups like the Heritage Foundation and the Eagle Forum.

For tax purposes, Numbers USA has two arms, an educational foundation and an advocacy group that lobbies Congress. Together, Mr. Beck said, they have a budget of $3 million this year, but will probably raise and spend $4.5 million.

Mr. Beck said that in the past the group received about two-thirds of its money from foundations like the Colcom Foundation of Pittsburgh and the Weeden Foundation in New York. Many of these foundations have an interest in conservation.

Numbers USA has raised the rest of its money from individual contributors over the Internet. The group collects detailed information on its members — their ethnic background, politics, religious affiliations, occupations and concerns — so it can choose the most effective advocates on any particular issue.

In a survey question on religion, the group said the information would be useful because many lawmakers were likely to respond better to people with “a very similar religious worldview.”

“This is our citizen army,” Mr. Beck said, pointing to a map that showed members of his group in every Congressional district.

-----END OF ARTICLE-----

By the way, you can read my book (mentioned in the story) and print it for free at:

THE CASE AGAINST IMMIGRATION, published by W.W. Norton & Co., New York

Unfortunately, very little in the book is out of date even though it was published 11 years ago.

You can read a description of the book and blurbs from several reviews on our website.

Finally let me thank all of you who have provided the financial support that has been the "match" that foundations have to have in order to provide their grants to us. Your donations are important all by themselves, but they are doubly important since they make it possible to receive foundation funds.

We will be using all of our resources the rest of this summer trying to increase the number of companies using the electronic verification systems -- and squeezing more and more illegal workers out of our jobs and communities. Georgia and Arizona and Colorado legislatures have paved the way by forcing this for businesses in their state.

HELP REMOVE THE JOBS MAGNET!

 

This may be a good time for you to make sure that you've let us know all of the areas you are interested in. In order to further customize the type of alerts you receive click here http://www.numbersusa.com/survey?action=longlist

As a NumbersUSA subscriber, you will receive occasional emails about immigration-related opportunities. If you want to increase or reduce the frequency of these emails, click here and choose from Total Activism, Moderate Activism, or Limited Activism at the bottom of your registration form: http://www.numbersusa.com/user

NumbersUSA - relies upon individuals like you to reach its goal of an environmentally sustainable and economically just America.