Immigration Reform Bill
Threatens Workers' Privacy, ACLU Says
Since 04-22-06
By Monisha Bansal
CNSNews.com Staff Writer
April 21, 2006
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?Page=/Nation/archive/200604/NAT20060421a.html
(CNSNews.com) - Immigration legislation now pending in the Senate and already
passed by the House would threaten the privacy of all job-seekers, civil
libertarians say.
The American Civil Liberties Union and the AFL-CIO on Thursday said they oppose
expansion of a pilot project called the Employment Eligibility Verification
System, which is intended to help employers determine whether an individual is
legally allowed to work in this country.
The system includes a database of job seekers at the Department of Homeland
Security and the Social Security Administration. Employers would use the system
to look up a potential employee's Social Security number or alien identification
number to make sure those numbers are not fraudulent.
The system would require all workers, including American citizens, to get the
government's permission to work, critics say.
According to the ACLU, the Employment Eligibility Verification System would
create two massive government databases containing "sensitive personal
information" on every legal resident.
"Every worker would be registered in the two systems with data files tracking
every job they ever sought or held," the ACLU warned. The two systems would
combine that information with other personal identifiers, all keyed to a
person's Social Security number.
The ACLU called such a system a ripe target for identity thieves.
Caroline Frederickson, director of the ACLU's Washington Legislative Office,
said not only would it be expensive to expand the Employment Eligibility
Verification System (more than $11 billion according to one government
estimate), it would also be a threat to privacy.
"The proposed employer verification system would require Americans, regardless
of citizenship, to get a permission slip from the government to work. If
Congress wants to reform immigration, that's fine, she said; but it "shouldn't
use this legislation as a clandestine means to subvert our constitutional right
to privacy."
Jon Hiatt, AFL-CIO general counsel, said the proposed electronic verification
system "would actually make it more difficult for U.S. citizens and legal
immigrant workers to secure fair employment." The system leaves workers open to
exploitation and discrimination, he said.
Other critics have questioned the reliability of such a system. Would workers be
denied jobs because of government database errors?
The Department of Homeland Security has not said whether it supports the
mandatory verification provision. But on Thursday, DHS Secretary Michael
Chertoff announced a crackdown on employers who hire illegal immigrants.
Chertoff said the federal government arrested 1,187 people on charges stemming
from illegal immigration in multi-state raids on Wednesday -- more than the
total number of immigration violators arrested in 2005. And it's going to get
worse for "systematic violators," he said.
Russ Knocke, a spokesman for the Department of Homeland Security, told
GovExec.com that he would not comment on whether DHS supports mandatory status
verification for all job seekers.
"I'm not going to address a number of the issues we are discussing with Congress
in the press," GovExec.com quoted Knocke as saying. "I'll just tell you that we
are committed to strengthening work site enforcement."
Rep. Ken Calvert (R-Calif.), who introduced the legislation, said the success of
the pilot verification project means the system should become mandatory for all
workers.
"I support making this program mandatory because I believe it is one way to turn
off the 'job magnet' and stem the tide of illegal immigration," said Calvert.
Some immigration reform groups agree with him.
The ACLU noted that some conservative and business groups, including the
Heritage Foundation and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, also have expressed strong
objections to the employment verification provisions.
The Senate is expected to address immigration when it returns next week from its
Easter recess.