House Votes to Allow
Military to Assist in Border Security
Since 05-13-06
From: Waspscpo@aol.com [mailto:Waspscpo@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 6:50 PM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: House Votes to Allow Military to Assist in Border Security
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/May2006/20060512_5112.html
House Votes to Allow Military to Assist in Border Security
By Kathleen T. Rhem
American Forces Press Service
May 12, 2006
WASHINGTON, May 12, 2006 – The U.S. House of Representatives voted yesterday to
allow military forces to be used in border-security operations under certain
circumstances. In a 252-171 vote, House members agreed on an amendment to the
Sonny Montgomery National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007.
Representatives also voted yesterday to name the bill after Montgomery, a
retired congressman and tireless veterans advocate. Montgomery died today at age
85.
The act gives authority to the Defense Department to assign military members to
assist Homeland Security organizations in preventing the entry of terrorists,
drug traffickers and illegal aliens into the United States and in inspecting
cargo, vehicles and aircraft entering the United States to prevent weapons of
mass destruction or other terrorist or drug trafficking items from entering the
country.
The act specifies that such a move must be made at the request of the secretary
of Homeland Security, who must certify that the action "is necessary to respond
to a threat to national security posed by the entry into the United States of
terrorists, drug traffickers, or illegal aliens." Pentagon spokesman Bryan
Whitman stressed that the military already has been helping other government
agencies in some border-security functions, namely surveillance with unmanned
aerial vehicles.
"I think it's important to understand that the United States military does
provide some assistance to the states currently," he said. Governors in some
border states use National Guard servicemembers in border-security missions, as
well. Whitman said it's important to remember that governors have authority to
mobilize their National Guard forces as they see fit as long as they pay for the
mobilization from within state budgets.
The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 largely forbids the U.S. military from becoming
involved in domestic law-enforcement actions. The Coast Guard and National Guard
troops under the control of state governors are excluded from the act, however.
"This county has always had a certain level of discomfort & with military doing
things that are law enforcement-type activities," a senior official said on
background.
Critics of such military use point to the case of 18-year-old Ezequiel
Hernandez, who was shot and killed by a U.S. Marine patrol near the Rio Grande
River at Redford, Texas, in 1997. The Marines said Hernandez fired at them, and
the corporal who pulled the trigger was not charged with a crime. But the case
brought about widespread attention to and debate on the role the U.S. military
plays in border enforcement.
Similar issues have been raised about the military's role within the United
States since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. The federal government
also can pay for governors to mobilize their National Guard forces in the case
of national emergencies. This mechanism was used during recovery efforts for
Hurricane Katrina. Activated Guard forces remained under their governors'
operational control, but federal funds were used to pay for the operation. In
addition, National Guard forces can be federalized then used in the same manner
as active-duty forces.
Press reports today state that Assistant Defense Secretary for Homeland Defense
Paul McHale has asked defense leaders to devise options for use of military
forces in border-enforcement activities. Defense officials today did not
specifically confirm this, but said such a move would be consistent with
contingency planning that goes on every day in the Pentagon. "This is a building
that develops options, & develops potential courses of action," the official
said.
"This is not a decision the Defense Department would make, though. Border
security (and) policing is not the primary role or mission of the United States
military." Language in the bill refers to allowing military members to assist
Homeland Security assets in preventing terrorists from entering the United
States. Officials have long recognized that illegal trafficking in people and
weapons through Latin America poses a threat to the United States. Rumsfeld and
his Central American counterparts discussed this issue at a conference in Miami
in October.
All in attendance agreed that porous borders to the south can contribute to
international terrorism. "Drug traffickers, smugglers, hostage takers,
terrorists, violent gangs: These are threats that are serious," Rumsfeld said at
the conference Oct. 12. Whitman said today that the United States stresses to
South and Central American neighbors the importance of border security.
Ungoverned spaces and available funding for illicit activities certainly can
have a relationship with terrorism, he said.
"That's why we should be concerned," he said. Whitman also said that today's
meeting between Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and Mexican National
Defense Secretary Gen. Gerardo Ricardo Vega is "unrelated to any current
speculation that I see in current press reporting." "This has been on the
schedule for quite some time," he said.
Biography:
Donald H. Rumsfeld
News Archive
NOTE: View the
original
version of this web page on
DefenseLINK, the official website of the U.S. Department of Defense. Visit
the Defense Department's Web site "America Supports You" at
http://www.americasupportsyou.mil,
that spotlights what Americans are doing in support of U.S. military men and
women serving at home and abroad.
Visit the Defense Department's Web site for the latest news and information
about America's response to the war against terrorism: "Defend America" at
http://www.DefendAmerica.mil.
YNCS Don Harribine, USN(ret)