Federal Judge Blocks
Pennsylvania Town's Crackdown on Illegal Immigrants
Since 11-09-06
Wednesday, November 01, 2006
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,226818,00.html?sPage=fnc.specialsections/immigration
ALLENTOWN, Pa. — Just hours before they were scheduled to go into effect, a
federal judge blocked the city of Hazleton from enforcing two ordinances
targeting illegal immigrants.
The measures, approved by City Council last month, would have imposed fines on
landlords who rent to illegal immigrants and denied business permits to
companies that give them jobs. They also would have required tenants to register
with City Hall and pay for a rental permit. They were supposed to go into effect
Wednesday.
U.S. District Judge James Munley on Tuesday ruled that landlords, tenants and
businesses that cater to Hispanics faced "irreparable harm" from the laws and
issued a temporary restraining order blocking their enforcement.
"We find it in the public interest to protect residents' access to homes,
education, jobs and businesses," he wrote in a 13-page opinion.
The ordinances have put the city of Hazleton in the spotlight as towns, cities
and states around the country grapple with growing illegal immigrant populations
in the absence of any comprehensive immigration reform bill coming out of
Washington.
Many immigrant groups have rallied in Hazleton in opposition of the measures. In
the city's Hispanic business district, some shops have closed while others
struggle to stay open.
• Visit FOXNews.com's NEW! Immigration Center
Hispanic groups and the ACLU sued Hazleton on Monday, contending that the laws
trample on the federal government's exclusive power to regulate immigration.
The plaintiffs include the Hazleton Hispanic Business Association, landlords, a
restaurateur and several illegal immigrants facing eviction, including children
who attend public schools.
Mayor Lou Barletta, who spearheaded the crackdown, has argued that illegal
immigrants have brought an increase in drugs, crime and gangs to the city. The
city's lawyers on Tuesday cited a 10 percent increase in crime between 2004 and
2005 as a reason why the ordinances should be enforced.
Munley, however, wrote that the city "offers only vague generalizations about
the crime allegedly caused by illegal immigrants, but has nothing concrete to
back up these claims." The city also failed to provide statistics on the number
of illegal immigrants living in Hazleton, he wrote.
Furthermore, Munley wrote, the plaintiffs have a "reasonable probability" of
getting the laws declared unconstitutional.
Hazleton's crackdown, which was announced in June, has spurred other towns to
pass similar laws. Municipal officials view the Hazleton lawsuit and a similar
one in Riverside, N.J., as test cases.
Witold J. Walczak, legal director of the ACLU of Pennsylvania, hailed Tuesday's
decision as an important victory.
"I think what's important is the judge recognized that this ordinance has the
potential to cause real harm by costing people their jobs, their houses and
requiring children to leave schools," he said.
The judge's restraining order expires Nov. 14. He indicated that he will
schedule a hearing on the ACLU's motion for a temporary injunction.
Barletta said he is convinced the courts will ultimately uphold the law. He
noted his lawyers had only a few hours to prepare for Tuesday's hearing and said
he is confident they will "prove our right to defend and protect our citizens."
"I'm not discouraged. They may have delayed enforcement for now, but this too
shall pass," Barletta said Tuesday. "We have only begun to fight."
The Associated Press contributed to this report.