Bush "Chastened" by
Albright & Co. Over Iraq
Since 01-06-06
Friday, January 6, 2006
NY Times Intelligence reporter David Sanger covers President Bush's unusual
White House conclave of 13 present and former secretaries of state and
secretaries of defense in his Friday story, "Visited by a Host of
Administrations Past, Bush Hears Some Chastening Words.? (Bush invited them
over, of course, they didn?t just drop by for a "visit.")
The text box sets the tone, with Bush portrayed as on the defensive: "Colin
Powell held his peace. Madeleine Albright, though, gave a piece of her mind."
Sanger leads off with this ominous anti-administration slant: "Colin L. Powell
said nothing -- a silence that spoke volumes to many in the White House on
Thursday morning. His predecessor, Madeleine K. Albright, a bit stirred up after
hearing an exceedingly upbeat 40-minute briefing to 13 former secretaries of
state and defense about how well things are going in Iraq, asked President Bush
whether, with the war "taking up all the energy" of his foreign policy team, he
had let the nuclear programs in Iran and North Korea spin out of control and
allowed Latin America and China policy suffer by neglect.
"I can't let this comment stand," Mr. Bush shot back, telling Ms. Albright and
the rare assembly of her colleagues, who reached back to the Kennedy White
House, that his administration "can do more than one thing at a time." The Bush
administration, he insisted, had "the best relations of any country with Japan,
China and Korea," and had active programs to make alliances around the world."
Sanger has long lambasted Bush for being in a bubble and unwilling to hear
opposing points of view. Yet when he does so, as he did yesterday, Sanger gives
him no credit, just veiled criticism for brevity. Sanger termed Bush's address
an "exceedingly upbeat 40-minute briefing."
Later he again emphasizes the alleged briefness of the brief: "But if it was a
bipartisan consultation, as advertised by the White House, it was a brief one.
Mr. Bush allowed 5 to 10 minutes for interchange with the group -- which
included three veterans of the Vietnam era: Robert S. McNamara, Melvin R. Laird
and James R. Schlesinger -- before herding the whole group into the Oval Office
for what he called a "family picture.""
Sanger opines that "many mistakes had been made" in Iraq: "But a lot of
bitterness remains, and several of the former cabinet members invited on
Thursday observed that Mr. Bush had waited more than 1,000 days into the war in
Iraq -- and after many mistakes had been made -- to gather together the men and
one woman who once held their own skull sessions in that room, and who once used
the West Wing as a backdrop for arguments over Vietnam and Somalia, the Balkans
and the 1991 Gulf war."
And this being Sanger, there's a linkage of the Iraq War with Vietnam, and makes
yet another crack at the alleged brevity: "In the few minutes that he engaged
with his guests, Mr. Bush seemed to call on the oldest officials present
[including] Mr. McNamara, whose own second-guessing about his decisions on
Vietnam have now become legendary"."
MRC's Brent Baker caught Sanger's snide attitude at NewsBusters, pointing out
how other media outlets managed to keep their eyes off the clock.