An Ethical Basis for War Against Political Islam
This newsletter is one of a series on the subject-Newsletter #10
By Bill Warner
Strategy--A Way to Defeat Political Islam
Before we discuss strategy, we must declare our moral purpose. Our moral purpose is to defend the very existence of the culture of the Golden Rule, an ethical civilization, from the 1400-year assault by the dualistic ethics of political Islam. We must stop the continued killing of kafirs, the enslavement of humanity and the spread of terror by Islam.
Islam represents 20% of the world's population and is growing. Islam is united, has a vision, a strategy and successful tactics.
Political correctness and multi-culturalism rule our world. Our government will not help in this war and instead gives aid and comfort to the "minority" Muslims. Our government is staffed by multiculturalists who will give every edge to Muslims. Our schools have been occupied by the Muslim Brotherhood and the dhimmi leftist professors.
Kafirs are divided into Christian, Jew, Hindu, Buddhist, atheist, conservative and liberal.
Each of the divisions has further divisions. The relations between the groups is marked by historical rivalries and hatreds. No group comprehends the suffering of others at the hands of Islam.So not only do none of the victims know their own story, they do not know the story of the others.
The Muslims have a great momentum. They are taking over by birth and immigration.
We have fewer children while Muslims have huge families. Osama bin Laden has 53 children. Demographic statistics show that France will become Islamic in the year 2020.
Run the population numbers.
Islam knows us well. Islam knows our history, secret shame, rivalries and hatreds, weaknesses and divisions. Kafirs don't know anything about Islam. We may fear and dislike it but that is just "feelings", not knowledge. Our so-called experts (none of whom know the actual doctrine of political Islam) make apologies and tell us that all of Islam's problems are caused by our poor governmental policies.
We are filled with cultural self-loathing, demoralized, fatalistic, nihilistic, too fat and too rich. (Wealthy people are weak at war, they have too much to protect.) We have lost the mind of war and feel that "peace" is the moral high ground. We are pacifists in the face of jihad. Our artists extol the virtues of peace with no knowledge about what happens when peaceful people are vanquished.
A Strategy for the Weak
At this stage of our intellectual and emotional development, our strategies are limited. We are too weak to attack Islam and need an opening strategy for now.
First, we must learn the doctrine of political Islam. We must know the enemy. We must also know who our allies are and who are the allies of Islam. We have two sets of enemies-the far enemy, Islam, and the near enemy-those who apologize for Islam, the dhimmis.
The thought of actually attacking Islam is too frightening at this stage of the game.
However, we can make flanking attacks on our enemy's allies, the apologists. Even dhimmis can think about attacking or pressuring the near enemy.
We can make a flanking attack on our enemy by attacking his strategies. We must expose Islam through its doctrine from the Koran, the Sunna (the Hadith and the Sira).
According to Sun Tsu in The Art of War, attacking your enemy's strategy is the highest level strategy. And Islam's strategy is laid out in the Trilogy. We now have the weapons, the books exposing their strategy.
Another principle of Sun Tsu is to shape the enemy. Islam always poses as a religion to cloak their politics . It is useless to attack a religion, so Islamic politics are under the radar. We must shape Islam as a political doctrine. We must attack the far enemypolitical
Islam. This means that we attack Mohammed, not Allah.
So we have a slogan for our opening strategy:
We must form ourselves into a community. The term kafir civilization has been used in this work, but this is not an historic fact, it is just a concept. However, we must make ourselves conscious of who we are or we will lose.
When the Orthodox church in Bethlehem was destroyed by the Palestinian jihadists in 2002, no one protested. The American Christians did not protest, the Hindus did not protest, nor did the Jews protest, the TV/print media did not protest. But when a mosque in Iraq got hit by American fire, everyone knew it. All of Islam protested, along with their apologist allies. Moral: the Muslims are organized. Kafirs do not even know they who they are.
This must change. There are many ways for this to change, but one that we need is a Web network community-call it kafir Web community.
The kafir Web community must carry out the functions:
We have hundreds of Web sites that speak out against Islam. Each stands alone. There is an informal group of people who may visit different sites and carry information from one site to the other, but each site is an island unto itself.
Imagine that all of the anti-Islamic sites were members of a community site list-serve. In this way, Web site owners could communicate among themselves. This could serve two functions.
One, we could mobilize, focus and coordinate tactics during special times such as the Mohammed cartoon attacks.
Two, there are materials that it would be good for many to publish at the same time. For instance, if this pamphlet were to be spread by the site network to all the sites, then it could be read simultaneously across the globe.
You get a much better strategic impact from speed and a broad front.
And who knows what else can happen as site owners communicate with each other?
At this time most people
personally know only a few people from church or another social group who are
working in some way against Islam. Even if you wanted to meet someone else from
your town how would you do it? This is a geographic grouping. Another grouping
could be writers, scholars, translators or jihad history buffs. We need a way to
form special communities (actually the Web site community is a special case).
We need to use the Web to form local communities.
We Kafirs usually act as
individuals, but we must have ways to unite and attack as a pack or swarm. Islam
does this with great effect. When they need e-mails or phone calls, they use the
Islamic community, not individuals.
Swarm software would link a community of intellectual warriors with projects. As an example, a project could be to protest the way an event was portrayed in a newspaper. Let's further assume that the event came from a news-wire and so is in many papers.
We need a way for one writer to send a letter to all of those who need it.
You live in a small town and wake
up one day to find that Muslims, who moved here a few years ago, are pressuring
and making demands to use the school for prayer during Ramadan. The ACLU howls
if the Bible is taught in schools, but makes no protest about the Islamic school
usage during Ramadan
Or: you live in a city and when reading the paper, watching TV or talking to a friend find out that Muslims are making demands that we change to accommodate Islam. You feel helpless and afraid. Everything about these events seem wrong, but no one in the media or government will even give guidance on how to protect our very civilization.
Multi-culturalism says that even wanting to preserve your culture is biased thinking. Political correctness says that any talk about Islam that is negative or judgemental is hate speech or racist.We really don't even know exactly what it is we are losing, but we are losing. We are losing a war that is not allowed to be spoken of. We must form a political community. We must have organizations that works at the pure grass-roots.First and foremost, we need ways to teach people what is going on. Islam will make demands on every area of our lives. Education, politics, customs, medicine, art, law, funding will all have demands and pressure to change to be more Islamic.
Saudia Arabia and other Islamic nations spend billions of dollars each year to spread Islam in the US. And what do we have to oppose this multi-billion dollar political organization with a 40-year head start? A few volunteers with no budget and no support.
Who is going to win?
We must have national organizations that can support local politics. We must lobby about national issues such as immigration and the massive Federal welfare programs for Muslims.This means money. We must move from amateur status to professional status.
We must also have state and local organizations that can deal with lobbying at the state and local level.
We are divided with many
historical rivalries. Hindus dislike Christians who try to convert them. The
rift between Jews and Christians is an old one. The Left is plagued by cultural
self-loathing and disdain of Christians. Such is the nature of humanity. This is
no problem, except for one thing, these rivalries prevent us from working
together against our enemy, political Islam.
We must see the difference between a friend and an ally. We don't have to be friends. We don't even have to like each other. America and Russia were allies during World War II, but were never friends. We worked together for a common cause. Let's take a real life example from the viewpoint of a Hindu. The Dalai Lama went to see the Pope at the Vatican in 2006 to talk about Islam. This was after the Pope had quoted a Byzantine priest who criticized Islam as being violent. Islam responded by rioting and killing.
Now the Dalai Lama is viewed as a friend by Hindus and the Pope is one of the hated Christians. But the Dalai Lama told the Pope that he should not stir up the Muslims and those "mischievous" jihadists. Mischievous? That is what you call a child who deliberately does something wrong. But for the Dalai Lama, killing and raping a nun is called mischievous. The Dalai Lama is a dhimmi and the near enemy. So, in actual fact, the Dalai Lama is a friend to the Hindus and an ally of Islam. The Pope is not a friend of the Hindus, but he is an ally against Islam.
We need to stop acting like hurt children and realize that Islam will destroy the Dalai Lama, the Pope, and the rest of us. We must start being allies or the kafir civilization will be annihilated like the Hindu civilization in Pakistan or the Christian civilization in Turkey.
To the end of healing our rivalries, we need to develop ambassadors. There are already people who attend multicultural events, but an Ambassador is very different.
Those multicultural events, frequently religious dialogs, are about making and being friends. (A dialog is a politically correct term that means no issues which actually divide people will be freely discussed.) An Ambassador is armed with the truth about the doctrine of political Islam and its history of annihilation. They also know every groups' secret shame. An Ambassador represents one group to another for the purpose of making alliances between rival groups of Kafirs.
Ambassadors set up frank discussions, not dialogs, between groups to strengthen alliances. If friendships are established, fine, but making allies is the point.
The Doctrine Project--Knowing the Far Enemy
The doctrine of political Islam is not common knowledge. How can we come to common solutions if we don't have common knowledge?
There are only two sources of knowledge about Islam-history and doctrine. The history is complicated in two ways. There are the separate histories of each religious and cultural group and most of the history has been deliberately forgotten-cultural amnesia.
The problem with the Islamic doctrine is that until the 21st century, it has been far too complicated for anyone except an imam, an Islamic religious and political leader, to understand. We are fortunate that the complete doctrine of political Islam is now available and can be easily understood.
The doctrine is the key to understanding Islam. And unlike the history, it is pure and uncorrupted as Islam has proudly kept every single word preserved for us to use for our own aims.Every action and thought of Islam is based upon the Islamic Trilogy, Koran, Sira and Hadith. To know the Trilogy is to know the heart and mind of Islam.
One of the best ways of knowing the far enemy is to know the political doctrine and educate others about the essence of Islam. The doctrine has one overwhelming characteristic-it is intellectually, emotionally, and ethically repulsive. We must master the doctrine ourselves. It gives great power in thinking strategically and tactically. In debates you can easily prevail over any apologist for Islam.
We need to sponsor training sessions for ourselves. Some people can learn from
reading alone, but others need a group to assist them. The trainings must also include how to use argument and persuasion to defend our civilization.
We must do is to put the Islamic political doctrine in service to our own strategy: attack the near enemy and expose the far enemy. We must put the doctrine in front of:
· Political leaders
· Opinion makers in the media and universities
· Military, law enforcement and intelligence officers
· Bloggers and others active on the Web
· Other opinion makers
· This list divides itself into those we need to see in person and those we can reach by email or phone. Political leaders fall into the category of personal visitation. Committees must contact and educate officials about the doctrine of political Islam. We should set a goal of a meeting with every Congressman, Senator, and every governor. At the meeting we should express our fear of political Islam and our fear of officials ignorance of Islam.
· The ignorance can be eliminated by reading the books detailing the doctrine.Others should be contacted by e-mail or letter and given a chance to receive the gift of books detailing the doctrine of political Islam and its history.
· We must let Mohammed speak for himself to the leaders, officials and others.
The Curriculum Project--Knowing the Far Enemy
Our public officials, diplomats, military and the media are all advised and trained by the Middle East experts that are in our universities. The ideology of the universities is totally driven by explaining everything about Islam by its reaction to us. The political doctrine of Islam is never used to explain what is happening or predict what will happen.
A computer search of a dozen universities that have Middle East degree programs showed that not one degree program teaches the political doctrine of Islam. Their graduates study Arabic language, Arabic literature, architecture, and history. This is bigoted and illogical. Every act and word by Islam starts with the Koran and the Sunna.
It is impossible to every understand Islam without knowing its view and motivation. So it follows that the doctrine of political Islam must be added to the knowledge base that every graduate has to learn.
A graduate of these programs can advise officials and never have the slightest clue as to what actually motivates Islam.
But one of the things that motivates our university elites is race and money. It goes like this: about 30 years ago Saudi Arabia started pouring money into our top universities.
They funded chairs, gave donations to the departments, built buildings. But then came demands. Islamic departments must not be headed by white, kafir scholars. So Muslim scholars became the ideological drivers in the university system. And the white-boy professors deferred in all ideological demands. They serve Islam as self-loathing dhimmis.
So whatever, Islam wants, Islam gets at Harvard and other universities. We are
betrayed. Many of the universities are the near enemy.
We must create and implement curriculums at courageous schools that will teach a program based upon the actual doctrine of Islam. We must turn out students who can debate and write based upon the Islamic Trilogy. We must dominate the market place of ideas and produce young minds that are not dhimmi-zed.
This would be a rigorous academic curriculum. Graduates could read Arabic, know the Koran, Sira and Hadith. The history of the Islamic conquest of the universal ethical civilization would be studied. They would know the suffering of the dhimmi. Since they must be warriors, they must also study writing, speaking, logic and persuasion.
Every public school textbook that mentions Islamic history has been vetted by CAIR (a Hamas "civil rights" organization). To counter this we must lobby to have the history of the victims of jihad and dhimmitude be added to textbooks. We must let the pain of our ancestors be known.
Every slave sold in America was
wholesaled out of a Islamic slave system that had been in existence a thousand
years before they started selling Africans to the Europeans. And Islam enslaved
a million Europeans. All of this history must be added to the public curriculum.
Islam must bear the historical burden that it deserves.
Islam has a large body of doctrine about how to subjugate women. However, feminist studies never give a critical look at the doctrine. We must find ways to see Islam's doctrine about women is taught.